Supermassive black hole

Deep within the hearts of nearly every galaxy, including our own Milky Way, lurk cosmic behemoths known as supermassive black holes. These enigmatic objects possess masses millions, even billions, of times that of our Sun, exerting an unimaginable gravitational pull that shapes their galactic homes. Unraveling their secrets is key to understanding the very evolution of the universe. The existence of supermassive black holes was first theorized to explain the incredible energy output of distant quasars, leading to decades of groundbreaking astronomical detective work. Supermassive black holes grow through a combination of relentless accretion of surrounding matter and dramatic mergers with other black holes, yet their initial 'seeds' remain a subject of active research. These cosmic giants are not just passive residents; they profoundly influence galactic evolution, driving powerful jets, regulating star formation, and even capable of being ejected from their host galaxies.

Source: Wikipedia

AI Summary

Deep within the hearts of nearly every galaxy, including our own Milky Way, lurk cosmic behemoths known as supermassive black holes. These enigmatic objects possess masses millions, even billions, of times that of our Sun, exerting an unimaginable gravitational pull that shapes their galactic homes. Unraveling their secrets is key to understanding the very evolution of the universe.

The Unveiling of Cosmic Monsters

Our journey into the heart of supermassive black holes begins in 1963 with astronomer Maarten Schmidt. He was studying a perplexing radio source, 3C 273, which seemed to be a star — but its spectrum was utterly baffling. It showed hydrogen emission lines, but they were incredibly redshifted, indicating the object was hurtling away from us at immense speed.

Applying Hubble's Law, Schmidt calculated that 3C 273 must be billions of light-years distant. For something so far away to appear so bright, it had to be radiating the energy equivalent of hundreds of entire galaxies! Yet, its rapid fluctuations in light suggested this colossal powerhouse was incredibly compact — no bigger than a single parsec across. These mysterious objects were dubbed 'quasi-stellar objects,' or quasars.

The Fickle Superstars

Initially, physicists Fred Hoyle and W. A. Fowler proposed 'supermassive stars' as an explanation for quasars. These hypothetical stars, weighing millions to billions of solar masses, could in theory produce the observed energy. However, theoretical physics quickly revealed a problem: stars above a certain critical mass are dynamically unstable.

Renowned physicist Richard Feynman and others pointed out that such massive, non-rotating stars would inevitably collapse. While some models suggested they might undergo cycles of collapse and explosion, the consensus soon shifted: these supermassive stars couldn't avoid collapsing entirely into something far denser and more extreme — a black hole.

Accretion: The Power Source

In 1964, Edwin Salpeter and Yakov Zeldovich independently proposed a revolutionary idea: the quasars' immense energy came from matter falling onto a massive compact object. As gas spirals inward, it forms a superheated accretion disk, radiating light, X-rays, and radio waves before vanishing beyond the event horizon. This process, called accretion, could generate the observed power from an object around 100 million solar masses.

Donald Lynden-Bell built upon this, suggesting in 1969 that the relatively dim cores of nearby galaxies were, in fact, old, inactive quasars — the remnants of once-ferocious feeding binges. Meanwhile, other researchers began linking these central powerhouses to the colossal, relativistic jets of particles seen blasting out from many galaxies.

Gravitational Footprints

The first dynamical evidence for these hidden monsters emerged in 1970. Arthur Wolfe and Geoffrey Burbidge noted that stars in the centers of elliptical galaxies moved with such high velocities that only an enormous mass concentration — far greater than ordinary stars could provide — could explain it. They proposed a central black hole, potentially up to 10 billion solar masses.

By 1978, strong dynamical evidence was found in Messier 87, an active elliptical galaxy, pointing to a central object of around 5 billion solar masses. Discoveries soon followed in other galaxies like Andromeda in 1984 and the Sombrero Galaxy in 1988, solidifying the idea that these giants were a common feature of galactic cores.

Our Own Galactic Heart

In 1971, Donald Lynden-Bell and Martin Rees hypothesized that even our Milky Way galaxy harbored a massive black hole at its center. Just three years later, in 1974, astronomers Bruce Balick and Robert Brown discovered a dense, immobile radio source at the galactic core. They named it Sagittarius A (pronounced 'Sagittarius A-star'), and it became the prime candidate for our galaxy's supermassive black hole.

The launch of the Hubble Space Telescope in 1990 provided unprecedented resolution, allowing even more refined observations. In 1994, Hubble confirmed that ionized gas in Messier 87 was orbiting its nucleus at incredible speeds, indicating a concentrated mass of 2.4 billion solar masses within a tiny region. This was powerful proof of a supermassive black hole.

A groundbreaking observation in 1995 used the Very Long Baseline Array to observe Messier 106. Astronomers directly measured the orbital motion of a gaseous disk around a concentrated mass of 36 million solar masses. This mass was constrained to a mere 0.13 parsecs — a region too small for anything but a single supermassive black hole to exist without immediately collapsing into itself.

Accompanying this was the discovery of a highly broadened iron K-alpha emission line from the galaxy MCG-6-30-15. This broadening was due to gravitational redshift, indicating that the light was escaping from only 3 to 10 Schwarzschild radii from the black hole. The Schwarzschild radius defines the boundary where escape velocity equals the speed of light.

Here, Rs is the Schwarzschild radius, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the black hole, and c is the speed of light. This fundamental equation illustrates the extreme compactness of black holes.

R_s = \frac{2GM}{c^2}

How Do They Form and Grow?

The precise origins of supermassive black holes remain a vibrant area of research. Astrophysicists largely agree that black holes can grow by accreting vast amounts of matter and by merging with other black holes. But how do the initial 'seeds' for these cosmic giants come into being?

The 'Seed' Hypotheses

One leading idea is that these seeds are simply the remnants of the first massive stars — black holes of tens to hundreds of solar masses left behind after supernovae. These 'stellar-mass' black holes then gorge on surrounding gas, gradually growing into intermediate-mass black holes and eventually supermassive ones. Another model suggests dense stellar clusters could undergo a runaway core collapse, leading to a black hole.

Alternatively, colossal gas clouds, even before the first stars ignited, might collapse directly into 'quasi-stars.' These objects, initially tens of thousands of solar masses, would then collapse straight into black holes without a supernova, preventing mass loss and allowing for rapid growth. Recent simulations even suggest that rare, turbulent clumps of gas in the early universe, called primordial halos, could directly form black holes of tens of thousands of solar masses.

A more exotic idea involves 'primordial black holes,' which might have formed directly from density fluctuations in the universe's first moments after the Big Bang. These would have had the maximum amount of time to accrete and grow, potentially explaining the very early appearance of extremely massive quasars.

The Accretion Challenge

For a black hole to grow efficiently through accretion, it needs a ready supply of dense matter with low angular momentum. Angular momentum is the 'spin' of matter, and normally, the process of spiraling inward means shedding this momentum outwards. This is a critical factor in how accretion disks form and how quickly black holes can consume material.

Observations confirm that quasars, powered by rapidly accreting supermassive black holes, were far more common in the younger universe. This tells us that these cosmic giants formed and grew remarkably quickly within the first billion years after the Big Bang, inside the earliest massive galaxies. They are not merely recent phenomena but ancient architects of cosmic structure.

The Ultimate Size Limit

Is there a limit to how large a supermassive black hole can become? Astrophysicists propose a theoretical upper limit for accreting black holes, typically around 50 billion solar masses, though some extreme cases might reach 270 billion. Beyond this, the accretion disk becomes unstable, coalescing into stars rather than feeding the black hole, effectively halting its growth.

This limit is tied to factors like the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) — the closest matter can orbit before spiraling into the black hole — and the Eddington luminosity, the maximum brightness a black hole can achieve by accreting matter before radiation pressure blows away infalling gas. In the far future, some black holes might grow to even stupendous sizes of 100 trillion solar masses as galaxy superclusters collapse, but only after their active feeding phases have long ended.

Cosmic Architects: Activity and Evolution

Supermassive black holes are not just passive residents; their immense gravity powers some of the most energetic phenomena in the universe, such as quasars and Seyfert galaxies. The intricate dance between a central black hole and its host galaxy is fundamental, reflected in empirical correlations like the M-sigma relation, which links the black hole's mass to the velocity dispersion of stars in the galaxy's bulge.

Active Galactic Nuclei

When a galactic core hosts a supermassive black hole that is actively accreting matter and radiating strongly, we call it an Active Galactic Nucleus, or AGN. The Milky Way's core, for example, isn't currently luminous enough to be considered an AGN. Scientists use a 'unified model' to explain the diverse types of AGN we observe, largely based on the viewing angle to the accretion disk and the black hole's luminosity.

AGN come in two main flavors: 'radiative mode' AGN, where most energy is electromagnetic radiation from a thick accretion disk, and 'jet mode' AGN, which launch powerful, relativistic jets of particles perpendicular to the disk. These jets can extend for millions of light-years, profoundly influencing their surroundings.

Galactic Mergers and Runaway Black Holes

When two galaxies collide and merge, their central supermassive black holes don't just sit idly by. They too are drawn together, eventually forming a gravitationally bound binary system. As they draw ever closer, gravitational radiation becomes dominant, causing them to spiral inwards and eventually coalesce into a single, even larger black hole.

This violent merger of black holes can have a dramatic consequence: gravitational recoil. The burst of gravitational waves from the coalescence can give the newly formed black hole a powerful 'kick,' propelling it at speeds of thousands of kilometers per second. This can send it hurtling away from the galactic center, or even eject it entirely from the galaxy, becoming a 'runaway black hole.'

Another way a black hole might be ejected is through a 'slingshot recoil,' where a third supermassive black hole is introduced during a subsequent galaxy merger. The three-body interaction can slingshot one or more black holes out of the galaxy, conserving momentum by propelling the others in the opposite direction. Scientists look for displaced quasars or binary AGN signatures as clues to these extraordinary events.

The Ultimate Fade Out: Hawking Radiation

While black holes are often described as eternal, quantum mechanics suggests otherwise. Stephen Hawking famously theorized that black holes emit 'Hawking radiation' due to quantum effects near the event horizon. This radiation slowly saps a black hole's mass and energy, causing it to shrink and eventually evaporate completely, albeit over truly astronomical timescales.

For a supermassive black hole of 100 billion solar masses, this evaporation process would take an unfathomable 2.1 x 10^100 years. Even the most colossal black holes, those predicted to reach 100 trillion solar masses in the universe's far future, would eventually vanish after an estimated 2.1 x 10^109 years. In the cosmic long run, even these monsters are fleeting.

Seeking the Invisible: The Evidence

How do we detect something that, by definition, absorbs all light? One of the most powerful tools is the Doppler effect. Light from matter orbiting a black hole is redshifted when moving away from us and blueshifted when moving towards us. Close to a black hole, orbital speeds are relativistic, causing extreme Doppler shifts and making the receding side of an accretion disk appear much fainter than the approaching side.

Article

Supermassive black hole

The first direct image of a supermassive black hole, found in the galactic core of Messier 87.

A supermassive black hole (SMBH or sometimes SBH) is the largest type of black hole, with its mass being on the order of hundreds of thousands, or millions to billions, of times the mass of the Sun (M☉). Black holes are a class of astronomical objects that have undergone gravitational collapse, leaving behind spheroidal regions of space that nothing, not even light, can escape. Observational evidence indicates that almost every large galaxy has a supermassive black hole at its center. For example, the Milky Way galaxy has a supermassive black hole at its center, corresponding to the radio source Sagittarius A. Accretion of interstellar gas onto supermassive black holes is the process responsible for powering active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and quasars.

Two supermassive black holes have been directly imaged by the Event Horizon Telescope; these are Sagittarius A, at the center of the Milky Way, and the black hole at the center of Messier 87, a giant elliptical galaxy.

Description

Supermassive black hole

Supermassive black holes are classically defined as black holes with a mass above 100,000 (105) solar masses (M☉); some have masses of several billion M☉. Supermassive black holes have physical properties that clearly distinguish them from lower-mass classifications. First, the tidal forces near the event horizon are significantly weaker for supermassive black holes. The tidal force on a body at a black hole's event horizon is inversely proportional to the square of the black hole's mass: a person at the event horizon of a 10 million M☉ black hole experiences about the same tidal force between their head and feet as a person on the surface of the Earth. Unlike with stellar-mass black holes, one would not experience significant tidal force until very deep into the black hole's event horizon.

It is somewhat counterintuitive that the density of an SMBH (defined as the mass of the black hole divided by the volume within its Schwarzschild radius) can be less than the density of water. This is because the Schwarzschild radius (${\displaystyle r{\text{s}}}$) is directly proportional to its mass. Since the volume of a spherical object (such as the event horizon of a non-rotating black hole) is directly proportional to the cube of the radius, the density of a black hole is inversely proportional to the square of the mass, and thus higher mass black holes have a lower average density.

The Schwarzschild radius of the event horizon of a nonrotating and uncharged supermassive black hole of around 1 billion M☉ is comparable to the semi-major axis of the orbit of Uranus, or about 19 AU. Some astronomers refer to black holes of greater than 5 billion M☉ as ultramassive black holes (UMBHs or UBHs), but the term is not broadly used. Possible examples include the black holes at the cores of TON 618, NGC 6166, ESO 444-46 and NGC 4889, which are among the most massive black holes known.

Some studies have suggested that the maximum natural mass that a black hole can reach, while being luminous accretors (featuring an accretion disk), is typically on the order of about 50 billion M☉. However, a 2020 study suggested even larger black holes, dubbed stupendously large black holes (SLABs), with masses greater than 100 billion M☉, could exist based on used models; some studies place the black hole at the core of Phoenix A in this category.

History of research

Supermassive black hole

The story of how supermassive black holes were found began with the investigation by Maarten Schmidt of the radio source 3C 273 in 1963. Initially this was thought to be a star, but the spectrum proved puzzling. It was determined to be hydrogen emission lines that had been redshifted, indicating the object was moving away from the Earth. Hubble's law showed that the object was located several billion light-years away, and thus must be emitting the energy equivalent of hundreds of galaxies. The rate of light variations of the source dubbed a quasi-stellar object, or quasar, suggested the emitting region had a diameter of one parsec or less. Four such sources had been identified by 1964.

In 1963, Fred Hoyle and W. A. Fowler proposed the existence of hydrogen-burning supermassive stars (SMS) as an explanation for the compact dimensions and high energy output of quasars. These would have a mass of about 105–109 M☉. However, Richard Feynman noted stars above a certain critical mass are dynamically unstable and would collapse into a black hole, at least if they were non-rotating. Fowler then proposed that these supermassive stars would undergo a series of collapse and explosion oscillations, thereby explaining the energy output pattern. Appenzeller and Fricke (1972) built models of this behavior, but found that the resulting star would still undergo collapse, concluding that a non-rotating 0.75×106 M☉ SMS "cannot escape collapse to a black hole by burning its hydrogen through the CNO cycle".

Edwin E. Salpeter and Yakov Zeldovich made the proposal in 1964 that matter falling onto a massive compact object would explain the properties of quasars. It would require a mass of around 108 M☉ to match the output of these objects. Donald Lynden-Bell noted in 1969 that the infalling gas would form a flat disk that spirals into the central "Schwarzschild throat". He noted that the relatively low output of nearby galactic cores implied these were old, inactive quasars. Meanwhile, in 1967, Martin Ryle and Malcolm Longair suggested that nearly all sources of extra-galactic radio emission could be explained by a model in which particles are ejected from galaxies at relativistic velocities, meaning they are moving near the speed of light. Martin Ryle, Malcolm Longair, and Peter Scheuer then proposed in 1973 that the compact central nucleus could be the original energy source for these relativistic jets.

Arthur M. Wolfe and Geoffrey Burbidge noted in 1970 that the large velocity dispersion of the stars in the nuclear region of elliptical galaxies could only be explained by a large mass concentration at the nucleus; larger than could be explained by ordinary stars. They showed that the behavior could be explained by a massive black hole with up to 1010 M☉, or a large number of smaller black holes with masses below 103 M☉. Dynamical evidence for a massive dark object was found at the core of the active elliptical galaxy Messier 87 in 1978, initially estimated at 5×109 M☉. Discovery of similar behavior in other galaxies soon followed, including the Andromeda Galaxy in 1984 and the Sombrero Galaxy in 1988.

Donald Lynden-Bell and Martin Rees hypothesized in 1971 that the center of the Milky Way galaxy would contain a massive black hole. Sagittarius A was discovered and named on February 13 and 15, 1974, by astronomers Bruce Balick and Robert Brown using the Green Bank Interferometer of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. They discovered a radio source that emits synchrotron radiation; it was found to be dense and immobile because of its gravitation. This was, therefore, the first indication that a supermassive black hole exists in the center of the Milky Way.

The Hubble Space Telescope, launched in 1990, provided the resolution needed to perform more refined observations of galactic nuclei. In 1994 the Faint Object Spectrograph on the Hubble was used to observe Messier 87, finding that ionized gas was orbiting the central part of the nucleus at a velocity of ±500 km/s. The data indicated a concentrated mass of (2.4±0.7)×109 M☉ lay within a 0.25″ span, providing strong evidence of a supermassive black hole.

Using the Very Long Baseline Array to observe Messier 106, Miyoshi et al. (1995) were able to demonstrate that the emission from an H2O maser in this galaxy came from a gaseous disk in the nucleus that orbited a concentrated mass of 3.6×107 M☉, which was constrained to a radius of 0.13 parsecs. Their ground-breaking research noted that a swarm of solar mass black holes within a radius this small would not survive for long without undergoing collisions, making a supermassive black hole the sole viable candidate. Accompanying this observation which provided the first confirmation of supermassive black holes was the discovery of the highly broadened, ionised iron Kα emission line (6.4 keV) from the galaxy MCG-6-30-15. The broadening was due to the gravitational redshift of the light as it escaped from just 3 to 10 Schwarzschild radii from the black hole.

On April 10, 2019, the Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration released the first horizon-scale image of a black hole, in the center of the galaxy Messier 87. In March 2020, astronomers suggested that additional subrings should form the photon ring, proposing a way of better detecting these signatures in the first black hole image. In 2020, the Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded jointly to Andrea Ghez and Reinhard Genzel "for the discovery of a supermassive compact object at the centre of our galaxy". This was considered the first definitive confirmation that Sagittarius A is indeed a supermassive black hole.

Formation

Supermassive black hole

An artist's conception of a supermassive black hole surrounded by an accretion disk and emitting a relativistic jet.

The origin of supermassive black holes remains an active field of research. Astrophysicists agree that black holes can grow by accretion of matter and by merging with other black holes. There are several hypotheses for the formation mechanisms and initial masses of the progenitors, or "seeds", of supermassive black holes. Independently of the specific formation channel for the black hole seed, given sufficient mass nearby, it could accrete to become an intermediate-mass black hole and possibly a SMBH if the accretion rate persists.

Distant and early supermassive black holes, such as J0313–1806, and ULAS J1342+0928, are hard to explain so soon after the Big Bang. Some postulate they might come from direct collapse of dark matter with self-interaction. A small minority of sources argue that they may be evidence that the Universe is the result of a Big Bounce, instead of a Big Bang, with these supermassive black holes being formed before the Big Bounce.

First stars

The early progenitor seeds may be black holes of tens or perhaps hundreds of M☉ that are left behind by the explosions of massive stars and grow by accretion of matter. Another model involves a dense stellar cluster undergoing core collapse as the negative heat capacity of the system drives the velocity dispersion in the core to relativistic speeds.

Before the first stars, large gas clouds could collapse into a "quasi-star", which would in turn collapse into a black hole of around 20 M☉. These stars may have also been formed by dark matter halos drawing in enormous amounts of gas by gravity, which would then produce supermassive stars with tens of thousands of M☉. The "quasi-star" becomes unstable to radial perturbations because of electron-positron pair production in its core and could collapse directly into a black hole without a supernova explosion (which would eject most of its mass, preventing the black hole from growing as fast). A 2018 theory proposes that SMBH seeds were formed in the very early universe each from the collapse of a supermassive star with mass of around 100,000 M☉.

Direct-collapse and primordial black holes

Large, high-redshift clouds of metal-free gas, when irradiated by a sufficient intense flux of Lyman–Werner photons, can avoid cooling and fragmenting, thus collapsing as a single object due to self-gravitation. The core of the collapsing object reaches extremely large values of matter density, of the order of about 107 g/cm3, and triggers a general relativistic instability. Thus, the object collapses directly into a black hole, without passing from the intermediate phase of a star, or of a quasi-star. These objects have a typical mass of about 100,000 M☉ and are named direct collapse black holes.

A 2022 computer simulation showed that the first supermassive black holes can arise in rare turbulent clumps of gas, called primordial halos, that were fed by unusually strong streams of cold gas. The key simulation result was that cold flows suppressed star formation in the turbulent halo until the halo's gravity was finally able to overcome the turbulence and formed two direct-collapse black holes of 31,000 M☉ and 40,000 M☉. The birth of the first SMBHs can therefore be a result of standard cosmological structure formation.

Primordial black holes (PBHs) could have been produced directly from external pressure in the first moments after the Big Bang. These black holes would then have more time than any of the above models to accrete, allowing them sufficient time to reach supermassive sizes. Formation of black holes from the deaths of the first stars has been extensively studied and corroborated by observations. The other models for black hole formation listed above are theoretical.

The formation of a supermassive black hole requires a relatively small volume of highly dense matter having small angular momentum. Normally, the process of accretion involves transporting a large initial endowment of angular momentum outwards, and this appears to be the limiting factor in black hole growth. This is a major component of the theory of accretion disks. Gas accretion is both the most efficient and the most conspicuous way in which black holes grow. The majority of the mass growth of supermassive black holes is thought to occur through episodes of rapid gas accretion, which are observable as active galactic nuclei or quasars.

Observations reveal that quasars were much more frequent when the Universe was younger, indicating that supermassive black holes formed and grew early. A major constraining factor for theories of supermassive black hole formation is the observation of distant luminous quasars, which indicate that supermassive black holes of billions of M☉ had already formed when the Universe was less than one billion years old. This suggests that supermassive black holes arose very early in the Universe, inside the first massive galaxies.

An artist's impression of stars born in winds from supermassive black holes.

Maximum mass limit

There is a natural upper limit to how large supermassive black holes can grow. Supermassive black holes in any quasar or active galactic nucleus (AGN) appear to have a theoretical upper limit of physically around 50 billion M☉ for typical parameters, as anything above this slows growth down to a crawl (the slowdown tends to start around 10 billion M☉) and causes the unstable accretion disk surrounding the black hole to coalesce into stars that orbit it. A study concluded that the radius of the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) for SMBH masses above this limit exceeds the self-gravity radius, making disc formation no longer possible.

A larger upper limit of around 270 billion M☉ was represented as the absolute maximum mass limit for an accreting SMBH in extreme cases, for example its maximal prograde spin with a dimensionless spin parameter of a = 1, although the maximum limit for a black hole's spin parameter is very slightly lower at a = 0.9982. At masses just below the limit, the disc luminosity of a field galaxy is likely to be below the Eddington limit and not strong enough to trigger the feedback underlying the M–sigma relation, so SMBHs close to the limit can evolve above this.

It has been noted that black holes close to this limit are likely to be rather even rarer, as it would require the accretion disc to be almost permanently prograde because the black hole grows and the spin-down effect of retrograde accretion is larger than the spin-up by prograde accretion, due to its ISCO and therefore its lever arm. This would require the hole spin to be permanently correlated with a fixed direction of the potential controlling gas flow, within the black hole's host galaxy, and thus would tend to produce a spin axis and hence AGN jet direction, which is similarly aligned with the galaxy. Current observations do not support this correlation.

The so-called 'chaotic accretion' presumably has to involve multiple small-scale events, essentially random in time and orientation if it is not controlled by a large-scale potential in this way. This would lead the accretion statistically to spin-down, due to retrograde events having larger lever arms than prograde, and occurring almost as often. There are also other interactions with large SMBHs that trend to reduce their spin, including particularly mergers with other black holes, which can statistically decrease the spin. All of these considerations suggested that SMBHs usually cross the critical theoretical mass limit at modest values of their spin parameters, so that 5×1010 M☉ in all but rare cases.

Although modern UMBHs within quasars and galactic nuclei cannot grow beyond around (5–27)×1010 M☉ through the accretion disk and as well given the current age of the universe, some of these monster black holes in the universe are predicted to still continue to grow up to stupendously large masses of perhaps 1014 M☉ during the collapse of superclusters of galaxies in the extremely far future of the universe.

Activity and galactic evolution

Supermassive black hole

Gravitation from supermassive black holes in the center of many galaxies is thought to power active objects such as Seyfert galaxies and quasars, and the relationship between the mass of the central black hole and the mass of the host galaxy depends upon the galaxy type. An empirical correlation between the size of supermassive black holes and the stellar velocity dispersion ${\displaystyle \sigma }$ of a galaxy bulge is called the M–sigma relation.

An AGN is now considered to be a galactic core hosting a massive black hole that is accreting matter and displays a sufficiently strong luminosity. The nuclear region of the Milky Way, for example, lacks sufficient luminosity to satisfy this condition. The unified model of AGN is the concept that the large range of observed properties of the AGN taxonomy can be explained using just a small number of physical parameters. For the initial model, these values consisted of the angle of the accretion disk's torus to the line of sight and the luminosity of the source. AGN can be divided into two main groups: a radiative mode AGN in which most of the output is in the form of electromagnetic radiation through an optically thick accretion disk, and a jet mode in which relativistic jets emerge perpendicular to the disk.

Mergers and recoiled SMBHs

The interaction of a pair of SMBH-hosting galaxies can lead to merger events. Dynamical friction on the hosted SMBH objects causes them to sink toward the center of the merged mass, eventually forming a pair with a separation of under a kiloparsec. The interaction of this pair with surrounding stars and gas will then gradually bring the SMBH together as a gravitationally bound binary system with a separation of ten parsecs or less. Once the pair draw as close as 0.001 parsecs, gravitational radiation will cause them to merge. By the time this happens, the resulting galaxy will have long since relaxed from the merger event, with the initial starburst activity and AGN having faded away.

Candidate SMBHs suspected to be recoiled or ejected black holes

The gravitational waves from this coalescence can give the resulting SMBH a velocity boost of up to several thousand km/s, propelling it away from the galactic center and possibly even ejecting it from the galaxy. This phenomenon is called a gravitational recoil. The other possible way to eject a black hole is the classical slingshot scenario, also called slingshot recoil. In this scenario first a long-lived binary black hole forms through a merger of two galaxies. A third SMBH is introduced in a second merger and sinks into the center of the galaxy. Due to the three-body interaction one of the SMBHs, usually the lightest, is ejected. Due to conservation of linear momentum the other two SMBHs are propelled in the opposite direction as a binary. All SMBHs can be ejected in this scenario. An ejected black hole is called a runaway black hole.

There are different ways to detect recoiling black holes. Often a displacement of a quasar/AGN from the center of a galaxy or a spectroscopic binary nature of a quasar/AGN is seen as evidence for a recoiled black hole.

Candidate recoiling black holes include NGC 3718, SDSS1133, 3C 186, E1821+643 and SDSSJ0927+2943. Candidate runaway black holes are HE0450–2958, CID-42 and objects around RCP 28. Runaway supermassive black holes may trigger star formation in their wakes. A linear feature near the dwarf galaxy RCP 28 was interpreted as the star-forming wake of a candidate runaway black hole. Later it was however found that this feature is likely a bulge-less edge-on galaxy. A study using JWST spectroscopy did however find more evidence for this object being produced by a runaway black hole.

Hawking radiation

Hawking radiation is black-body radiation that is predicted to be released by black holes, due to quantum effects near the event horizon. This radiation reduces the mass and energy of black holes, causing them to shrink and ultimately vanish. If black holes evaporate via Hawking radiation, a non-rotating and uncharged stupendously large black hole with a mass of 1×1011 M☉ will evaporate in around 2.1×10100 years. Black holes formed during the predicted collapse of superclusters of galaxies in the far future with 1×1014 M☉ would evaporate over a timescale of up to 2.1×10109 years.

Evidence

Doppler measurements

Simulation of a side view of a black hole with transparent toroidal ring of ionized matter according to a proposed model for Sgr A. This image shows the result of bending of light from behind the black hole, and it also shows the asymmetry arising by the Doppler effect from the extremely high orbital speed of the matter in the ring.

Some of the best evidence for the presence of black holes is provided by the Doppler effect whereby light from nearby orbiting matter is red-shifted when receding and blue-shifted when advancing. For matter very close to a black hole the orbital speed must be comparable with the speed of light, so receding matter will appear very faint compared with advancing matter, which means that systems with intrinsically symmetric discs and rings will acquire a highly asymmetric visual appearance. This effect has been allowed for in modern computer-generated images such as the example presented here, based on a plausible model for the supermassive black hole in Sgr A at the center of the Milky Way. However, the resolution provided by presently available telescope technology is still insufficient to confirm such predictions directly.

What already have been observed directly in many systems are the lower non-relativistic velocities of matter orbiting further out from what are presumed to be black holes. Direct Doppler measures of water masers surrounding the nuclei of nearby galaxies have revealed a very fast Keplerian motion, only possible with a high concentration of matter in the center. Currently, the only known objects that can pack enough matter in such a small space are black holes, or things that will evolve into black holes within astrophysically short timescales. For active galaxies farther away, the width of broad spectral lines can be used to probe the gas orbiting near the event horizon. The technique of reverberation mapping uses variability of these lines to measure the mass and perhaps the spin of the black hole that powers active galaxies.

In the Milky Way

Inferred orbits of six stars around supermassive black hole candidate Sagittarius A at the Milky Way Galactic Center

Evidence indicates that the Milky Way galaxy has a supermassive black hole at its center, 26,000 light-years from the Solar System, in a region called Sagittarius A because:

• The star S2 follows an elliptical orbit with a period of 15.2 years and a pericenter (closest distance) of 17 light-hours (1.8×1013 m or 120 AU) from the center of the central object. • From the motion of star S2, the object's mass can be estimated as 4.0 million M☉, or about 7.96×1036 kg. • The radius of the central object must be less than 17 light-hours, because otherwise S2 would collide with it. Observations of the star S14 indicate that the radius is no more than 6.25 light-hours, about the diameter of Uranus' orbit. • No known astronomical object other than a black hole can contain 4.0 million M☉ in this volume of space.

Infrared observations of bright flare activity near Sagittarius A show orbital motion of plasma with a period of 45±15 min at a separation of six to ten times the gravitational radius of the candidate SMBH. This emission is consistent with a circularized orbit of a polarized "hot spot" on an accretion disk in a strong magnetic field. The radiating matter is orbiting at 30% of the speed of light just outside the innermost stable circular orbit.

On January 5, 2015, NASA reported observing an X-ray flare 400 times brighter than usual, a record-breaker, from Sagittarius A. The unusual event may have been caused by the breaking apart of an asteroid falling into the black hole or by the entanglement of magnetic field lines within gas flowing into Sagittarius A, according to astronomers.

Outside the Milky Way

Artist's impression of a supermassive black hole tearing apart a star. Below: supermassive black hole devouring a star in galaxy RX J1242−11 – X-ray (left) and optical (right).

Unambiguous dynamical evidence for supermassive black holes exists only for a handful of galaxies; these include the Milky Way, the Local Group galaxies M31 and M32, and a few galaxies beyond the Local Group, such as NGC 4395. In these galaxies, the root mean square (or rms) velocities of the stars or gas rises proportionally to 1/r near the center, indicating a central point mass. In all other galaxies observed to date, the rms velocities are flat, or even falling, toward the center, making it impossible to state with certainty that a supermassive black hole is present.

Nevertheless, it is commonly accepted that the center of nearly every galaxy contains a supermassive black hole. The reason for this assumption is the M–sigma relation, a tight (low scatter) relation between the mass of the hole in the 10 or so galaxies with secure detections, and the velocity dispersion of the stars in the bulges of those galaxies. This correlation, although based on just a handful of galaxies, suggests to many astronomers a strong connection between the formation of the black hole and the galaxy itself.

On March 28, 2011, a supermassive black hole was seen tearing a mid-size star apart. That is the only likely explanation of the observations that day of sudden X-ray radiation and the follow-up broad-band observations. The source was previously an inactive galactic nucleus, and from study of the outburst the galactic nucleus is estimated to be a SMBH with mass of the order of a million M☉. This rare event is assumed to be a relativistic outflow (material being emitted in a jet at a significant fraction of the speed of light) from a star tidally disrupted by the SMBH. A significant fraction of a solar mass of material is expected to have accreted onto the SMBH. Subsequent long-term observation will allow this assumption to be confirmed if the emission from the jet decays at the expected rate for mass accretion onto a SMBH.

Individual studies

Supermassive black hole

Hubble Space Telescope photograph of the 4,400 light-year-long relativistic jet of Messier 87, which is matter being ejected by the 6.5×109 M☉ supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy

The nearby Andromeda Galaxy, 2.5 million light-years away, contains a 1.4+0.65 −0.45×108 (140 million) M☉ central black hole, significantly larger than the Milky Way's. The largest supermassive black hole in the Milky Way's vicinity appears to be that of Messier 87 (i.e., M87), at a mass of (6.5±0.7)×109 (c. 6.5 billion) M☉ at a distance of 48.92 million light-years. The supergiant elliptical galaxy NGC 4889, at a distance of 336 million light-years away in the Coma Berenices constellation, contains a black hole measured to be 2.1+3.5 −1.3×1010 (21 billion) M☉.

Masses of black holes in quasars can be estimated via indirect methods that are subject to substantial uncertainty. The quasar TON 618 is an example of an object with an extremely large black hole, estimated at 4.07×1010 (40.7 billion) M☉. Its redshift is 2.219. Other examples of quasars with large estimated black hole masses are the hyperluminous quasar APM 08279+5255, with an estimated mass of 1×1010 (10 billion) M☉, and the quasar SMSS J215728.21-360215.1, with a mass of (3.4±0.6)×1010 (34 billion) M☉, or nearly 10,000 times the mass of the black hole at the Milky Way's Galactic Center.

Some galaxies, such as the galaxy 4C +37.11, appear to have two supermassive black holes at their centers, forming a binary system. If they collided, the event would create strong gravitational waves. Binary supermassive black holes are believed to be a common consequence of galactic mergers. The binary pair in OJ 287, 3.5 billion light-years away, contains the most massive black hole in a pair, with a mass estimated at 18.348 billion M☉. In 2011, a super-massive black hole was discovered in the dwarf galaxy Henize 2-10, which has no bulge. The precise implications for this discovery on black hole formation are unknown, but may indicate that black holes formed before bulges.

A gas cloud with several times the mass of the Earth is accelerating towards a supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way.

In 2012, astronomers reported an unusually large mass of approximately 17 billion M☉ for the black hole in the compact, lenticular galaxy NGC 1277, which lies 220 million light-years away in the constellation Perseus. The putative black hole has approximately 59 percent of the mass of the bulge of this lenticular galaxy (14 percent of the total stellar mass of the galaxy). Another study reached a very different conclusion: this black hole is not particularly overmassive, estimated at between 2 and 5 billion M☉ with 5 billion M☉ being the most likely value. On February 28, 2013, astronomers reported on the use of the NuSTAR satellite to accurately measure the spin of a supermassive black hole for the first time, in NGC 1365, reporting that the event horizon was spinning at almost the speed of light.

In September 2014, data from different X-ray telescopes have shown that the extremely small, dense, ultracompact dwarf galaxy M60-UCD1 hosts a 20 million solar mass black hole at its center, accounting for more than 10% of the total mass of the galaxy. The discovery is quite surprising, since the black hole is five times more massive than the Milky Way's black hole despite the galaxy being less than five-thousandths the mass of the Milky Way.

Some galaxies lack any supermassive black holes in their centers. Although most galaxies with no supermassive black holes are very small, dwarf galaxies, one discovery remains mysterious: The supergiant elliptical cD galaxy A2261-BCG has not been found to contain an active supermassive black hole of at least 1010 M☉, despite the galaxy being one of the largest galaxies known; over six times the size and one thousand times the mass of the Milky Way. Despite that, several studies gave very large mass values for a possible central black hole inside A2261-BGC, such as about as large as 6.5+10.9 −4.1×1010 M☉ or as low as (6–11)×109 M☉. Since a supermassive black hole will only be visible while it is accreting, a supermassive black hole can be nearly invisible, except in its effects on stellar orbits. This implies that either A2261-BGC has a central black hole that is accreting at a low level or has a mass rather below 1010 M☉.

In December 2017, astronomers reported the detection of the most distant quasar known by this time, ULAS J1342+0928, containing the most distant supermassive black hole, at a reported redshift of z = 7.54, surpassing the redshift of 7 for the previously known most distant quasar ULAS J1120+0641.

The 7 billion M☉ supermassive black hole of NeVe 1 is responsible for the Ophiuchus Supercluster eruption – the most energetic eruption ever detected. From: Chandra X-ray Observatory

In February 2020, astronomers reported the discovery of the Ophiuchus Supercluster eruption, the most energetic event in the Universe ever detected since the Big Bang. It occurred in the Ophiuchus Cluster in the galaxy NeVe 1, caused by the accretion of nearly 270 million M☉ of material by its central 7 billion M☉ supermassive black hole. The eruption lasted for about 100 million years and released 5.7 million times more energy than the most powerful gamma-ray burst known. The eruption released shock waves and jets of high-energy particles that punched the intracluster medium, creating a cavity about 1.5 million light-years wide – ten times the Milky Way's diameter.

In February 2021, astronomers released, for the first time, a very high-resolution image of 25,000 active supermassive black holes, covering four percent of the Northern celestial hemisphere, based on ultra-low radio wavelengths, as detected by the Low-Frequency Array (LOFAR) in Europe.

In August 2025, a SMBH in little red dot CAPERS-LRD-z9 was reported whose canonical mass was estimated to be 3.8+27.8 −3.35×107 (38 million) M☉. This represents a confirmed massive black hole very early in the history of the universe (redshift of 9.288, only 500 million years after the big bang).