Suicidal empathy
The term "suicidal empathy" describes a controversial concept suggesting that excessive compassion can become detrimental, leading individuals or societies to act against their own long-term interests. It's a phrase that has rapidly gained traction in certain circles, igniting debates about the very nature of human compassion and its role in public policy. Let's delve into its origins, its proponents, and the strong criticisms it has faced. "Suicidal empathy" is a term coined to describe a purported phenomenon where prioritizing empathy over logic is seen as a destructive force for the individual or group exhibiting it. Despite being popularized by figures like Elon Musk, the concept lacks support in mainstream psychology and is primarily used within specific political and ideological contexts. Critics argue that the term is a 'right-wing buzzword' used to de-legitimize compassion towards marginalized groups and is often linked to broader conspiracy theories.
AI Summary
The term "suicidal empathy" describes a controversial concept suggesting that excessive compassion can become detrimental, leading individuals or societies to act against their own long-term interests. It's a phrase that has rapidly gained traction in certain circles, igniting debates about the very nature of human compassion and its role in public policy. Let's delve into its origins, its proponents, and the strong criticisms it has faced.
- "Suicidal empathy" is a term coined to describe a purported phenomenon where prioritizing empathy over logic is seen as a destructive force for the individual or group exhibiting it.
- Despite being popularized by figures like Elon Musk, the concept lacks support in mainstream psychology and is primarily used within specific political and ideological contexts.
- Critics argue that the term is a 'right-wing buzzword' used to de-legitimize compassion towards marginalized groups and is often linked to broader conspiracy theories.
What is 'Suicidal Empathy'?
At its core, "suicidal empathy" is a purported phenomenon where empathy, when taken to an extreme or misdirected, is claimed to be destructive. This isn't about healthy compassion, but rather a "pathological" form — one where understanding and feeling for others supposedly overshadows logic and consideration of long-term consequences for oneself or one's group.
The phrase itself was coined by evolutionary psychology professor Gad Saad. However, it's crucial to note that this concept currently has no support within the broader fields of psychology or sociology. Its proponents are typically not mental health professionals or academic sociologists.
Who Uses the Term?
You'll most commonly encounter "suicidal empathy" in the lexicon of "culture warriors," right-wing figures, and Christian nationalists. It often appears in discussions where empathy towards groups like immigrants or racial minorities is condemned. In fact, it has been openly called a "right-wing buzzword" by publications like The Bulwark.
The term frequently pops up in association with the controversial 'Great Replacement' conspiracy theory, which alleges that white populations are being systematically replaced by non-white immigrants. This connection highlights the specific ideological framework in which "suicidal empathy" is often employed.
Popularization and Specific Claims
The concept gained significant public traction when it was popularized by entrepreneur Elon Musk, who quoted Saad. According to Saad, "suicidal empathy" describes an inability to make optimal decisions when an individual is psychologically conditioned to prioritize empathy, or displays of empathy, over a more rational course of action.
Saad claims this purported "suicidal empathy" leads to prioritizing minority groups — such as "illegal migrants" — at the expense of the survival and security of one's own groups and values. It suggests a zero-sum game where compassion for one group necessarily harms another.
He offers other examples, such as the idea that sanctioning the participation of trans women in women's athletics infringes on the rights of cis women due to "suicidal empathy." Another claim is that it leads to advocating for a greater portion of U.S. government aid for "illegal migrants" over American veterans or victims of natural disasters.
In Broader Discourse
Elon Musk expanded on the concept, using the phrase "civilizational suicidal empathy" in a 2025 interview with podcaster Joe Rogan. Here, Musk suggested it referred to "weaponized" empathy designed to bring about specific political and policy modifications, implying a deliberate, harmful intent behind compassionate actions.
Beyond social policy, the term has also been applied to environmental policy. Commentator Iain Macwhirter, for instance, compared Britain's net-zero strategy to "suicidal empathy." He argued that the UK's "moral ambition" was superseding its "economic self-interest."
Macwhirter contended that by restricting North Sea oil and gas production, imposing steep windfall taxes, and accelerating the shift to renewables, the UK was undermining its own energy security and industrial base. These policies, he claimed, resulted in inflated electricity prices, unemployment, and increased dependence on imported fuel, all for climate targets not matched by larger global emitters.
The Strong Backlash and Criticism
The concept of "suicidal empathy" has faced significant criticism, often being linked directly to the "Great Replacement" conspiracy theory itself. Critics point out that both posit the imminent destruction of Western societies at the hands of immigrants, drawing a troubling parallel to white supremacist ideologies.
Even religious figures have weighed in. In 2025, Pope Francis criticized J.D. Vance for citing the medieval Catholic doctrine of 'ordo amoris' (the order of loves) to justify withholding empathy for migrants. This highlights the perceived moral implications of the term and its application.
News magazine Salon described the portrayal of empathy as a "weapon" as an "overt assault" on what is considered a natural human virtue. They argue that reducing empathy to a destructive force is a dangerous distortion of a fundamental aspect of human connection and morality.
Similarly, the magazine Eureka Street criticized Elon Musk for using "suicidal empathy" as a veiled way to suggest that "barbarians" are threatening "the American way of life." This interpretation reinforces the view that the term is used to create an 'us vs. them' narrative.
Historian of psychology Susan Lanzonia observed that she had never encountered such a vilification of empathy in historical or current psychological sources. Lanzonia concluded that the disparagement of empathy, through terms like "suicidal empathy," appears to be a calculated attempt to dehumanize people who might be in need of compassion.
Article
Suicidal empathy
Suicidal empathy is a purported phenomenon in which excessive, misdirected and pathological forms of empathy are destructive for the party that exhibits them. Proponents of the concept claim it happens through prioritizing compassion before commitment, understanding before alignment, and most simply – empathy over logic and long-term consequences.
Definition and popularization
Suicidal empathy
The term was popularized by Canadian marketing professor Gad Saad in his book Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind. According to Saad, suicidal empathy is the inability to implement optimal decisions when one is psychologically conditioned to prioritize empathy or displays of empathy over a rational course of action. He argues that suicidal empathy prioritizes minority groups such as illegal immigrants at the expense of survival and security of one's own groups and values. For example, Saad argues that in the United States, soldiers fighting for the country receive much less empathy than immigrant gang members. He associates the concept with the morals of Aesop's fables The Farmer and the Viper and The Scorpion and the Frog.
The Wall Street Journal linked Saad to Elon Musk, claiming the two had a 'public bromance'. Musk's usage of the term popularized it. In a 2025 interview with podcaster Joe Rogan, Musk uses the phrase "civilizational suicidal empathy" to refer to the alleged corrosion of American culture. According to Musk, suicidal empathy refers to weaponized empathy to bring about political and policy modifications.
Usage
Suicidal empathy
The term is sometimes used by right-wing commentators including Tommy Robinson, Benny Johnson, and Nick Shirley, political figures including Mike Lee, Ron DeSantis, and Randy Fine, and Christian nationalist figures to criticize empathy toward groups such as immigrants and non-white racial groups. In this context, it is sometimes linked to the Great Replacement conspiracy theory.
Iain Macwhirter has compared Britain's net zero strategy to suicidal empathy, arguing that the UK was undermining its own energy security and industrial base.
Writing for The Bulwark, Cathy Young said the phrase was "becoming a right-wing buzzword".
Reception
Suicidal empathy
Pope Francis criticized JD Vance in 2025 for citing the medieval Catholic doctrine of ordo amoris to justify the withholding of empathy for migrants. However, American theologian R. R. Reno wrote in an article titled "JD Vance is Right about the 'Ordo Amoris'" that "We should love our family first, then our neighbors, then love our community, then our country, and only then consider the interests of the rest of the world." The news magazine Salon called the portrayal of empathy as a weapon an "overt assault" on what is a "natural virtue" of human beings. The magazine Eureka Street criticized Elon Musk for using the term "suicidal empathy" as a way to say "barbarians" are going to threaten "the American way of life".
Historian of psychology Susan Lanzonia stated that she has never perceived a vilification of empathy as reflected in "current sources". Lanzonia believes that the disparagement of the concept of empathy is a structured attempt to dehumanize people who might be in need of it.
The Global Project Against Hate And Extremism has criticized the use of the term suicidal empathy as a way for the far right "to justify rampant xenophobia and Islamophobia."
The Guardian discussed Saad's book among other works critical of empathy, characterizing the topic as a right-wing effort "...to dismantle and discredit one of the essential tools for any society – our capacity to recognize and respond to suffering. We should see the campaign against empathy by Trump supporters for what it is: a flashing red light warning of fascist intent." Gad Saad's book Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind debuted at #1 on the New York Times' Combined Print & E-Book Nonfiction sales chart.