Seismic magnitude scales

Earthquakes are one of Earth's most powerful and unpredictable phenomena, capable of reshaping landscapes and lives in an instant. But how do we actually quantify their immense power? While many think of the 'Richter scale,' seismologists employ a diverse array of 'seismic magnitude scales' to precisely measure an earthquake's 'size'—a crucial step in understanding these forces and mitigating their impact. Seismic magnitude scales quantify an earthquake's total energy release, representing its overall 'size' at the source, distinct from the local ground shaking intensity. Various magnitude scales exist because different earthquake characteristics, depths, and geological environments necessitate specific measurement techniques to accurately capture their energy. The famous 'Richter scale' is a local magnitude measurement and is often misapplied, with the moment magnitude scale now serving as the global standard for assessing the true power of large earthquakes.

Source: Wikipedia

AI Summary

Seismic magnitude scales quantify an earthquake's total energy release, representing its overall 'size' at the source, distinct from the local ground shaking intensity.
Various magnitude scales exist because different earthquake characteristics, depths, and geological environments necessitate specific measurement techniques to accurately capture their energy.
The famous 'Richter scale' is a local magnitude measurement and is often misapplied, with the moment magnitude scale now serving as the global standard for assessing the true power of large earthquakes.

Measuring Earth's Tremors: Magnitude vs. Intensity

When an earthquake strikes, two key concepts help us understand its impact: magnitude and intensity. Magnitude describes the intrinsic 'size' or overall strength of an earthquake at its source—how much energy was released. It's a single number for each event.

Intensity, on the other hand, describes how much the ground shakes at a specific location, and how much damage it causes there. It's about the local experience, which can vary wildly depending on where you are relative to the epicenter.

Earthquakes occur when tectonic forces stress the Earth's crust to its breaking point, or overcome the friction holding blocks of crust in place. When this stress is released, it sends energy radiating outwards in the form of various seismic waves, causing the ground to shake, or quake.

So, while a quake's magnitude reflects its potential to cause shaking, the actual intensity you feel on the ground depends on many factors. Distance from the epicenter is one, but crucially, local soil conditions and geological structures play an enormous role.

Consider the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake in California. Areas built on soft, unstable soils—like San Francisco's Marina District, nearly 100 kilometers from the epicenter—experienced far more severe shaking and damage than areas closer to the source but on solid rock. The ground itself can amplify or dampen seismic waves.

Decoding the Quake: Seismic Waves and Seismograms

Earthquakes release their energy through different types of seismic waves. P-waves are the fastest, compressing and expanding rock like sound waves. S-waves arrive next, shaking the ground sideways. Both travel through the Earth's body. Surface waves, however, travel along the Earth's surface and are often the most destructive, especially for shallow quakes.

Scientists use instruments called seismographs to record these ground motions, creating a visual trace called a seismogram. By carefully analyzing a seismogram—identifying different waves and measuring characteristics like their timing, orientation, amplitude, or duration—we can determine an earthquake's magnitude. These measurements are then adjusted for factors like distance, the type of crust, and the specific seismograph used.

A fundamental characteristic of almost all magnitude scales, established by Charles Richter, is their logarithmic nature. This means each whole number increase on a magnitude scale represents a tenfold increase in the amplitude of the seismic waves measured. More dramatically, it signifies roughly a 32-fold increase in the energy released by the earthquake.

This logarithmic relationship is key to appreciating the immense jump in power between, say, a magnitude 5 and a magnitude 7 earthquake. However, many early scales had limitations, often 'saturating'—meaning they systematically underestimated the true size of very large events. This led to the development of a diverse family of scales, many of which have now been standardized by organizations like the IASPEI.

E \propto A^{1.5} \implies \text{Energy increase} = 10^{1.5} \approx 31.6

The Original: "Richter" Local Magnitude (ML)

The most famous scale, developed in 1935 by Charles F. Richter, is officially known as the Local Magnitude scale, or M L. Richter arbitrarily defined the zero point: an earthquake 100 km away causing a 0.001 mm displacement on a specific Wood-Anderson seismograph.

This formula relates the maximum wave amplitude (A) to a reference amplitude ($A0$) at a given distance ($\delta$). While revolutionary, the original Richter scale primarily measured maximum amplitude of shaking and had several significant limitations, especially for events outside its intended scope.

M_L = \log_{10}(A) - \log_{10}(A_0(\delta))

The M L scale often underestimated—or 'saturated' for—distant earthquakes (over ~600 km) due to wave attenuation. It also struggled with deep earthquakes, which produce smaller surface waves, and very strong earthquakes (over M~7) because it didn't fully account for the duration of shaking. Furthermore, the original scale, developed for Southern California, didn't accurately reflect quakes in regions with different crustal structures, like the stable continental crust east of the Rocky Mountains.

A Spectrum of Scales: Beyond the Richter

To overcome the limitations of the local magnitude scale, seismologists developed new methods. Body-wave magnitude scales, like mB and mb, focus on the faster P and S waves that travel through the Earth's interior. The mB scale, for instance, aimed to measure larger, more distant events, while the mb scale was refined to use short-period P waves, making it useful for detecting smaller events and even distinguishing natural quakes from underground nuclear explosions.

A special regional variant, the mbLg scale, was developed for areas like North America east of the Rockies. Here, the thick, granitic continental crust transmits a specific type of surface wave, called an Lg wave, very efficiently. This scale is crucial for accurately assessing earthquakes in these unique geological environments, where the standard M L scale falls short.

The Modern Standard: Moment Magnitude (Mw)

For the largest and most significant earthquakes, the Moment Magnitude scale (Mw), developed by Thomas Hanks and Hiroo Kanamori, is now the global standard. This scale is based on an earthquake's 'seismic moment' (M0), which is considered the most objective measure of its true physical size and total energy release.

Seismic moment (M0) quantifies the physical work done by an earthquake. It's calculated by multiplying three factors: the rigidity of the rock ($\mu$), the area of the fault rupture (A), and the average distance the fault slipped (D). This gives us a direct measure of the energy released, in units like Newton-meters.

M_0 = \mu A D

Unlike earlier scales that could saturate, Mw provides a consistent and accurate measure across all earthquake sizes, from tiny tremors to the most colossal mega-quakes. This is why when you hear about a major earthquake today, scientific reports—even if the media still refers to it as 'Richter'—are almost always quoting its moment magnitude.

Specialized and Historical Scales

Beyond the major scales, seismologists use a fascinating array of specialized measurements. Tsunami magnitude scales (Mt, Mm), for example, are crucial for earthquakes that generate tsunamis, as these often involve slower ruptures that are better captured by longer-period wave measurements, essential for timely warnings.

Duration and coda magnitude scales (Md, Mc) are handy for measuring very weak earthquakes, or extremely powerful ones that might drive a seismograph 'off-scale,' by estimating magnitude from the length of the shaking. For historical earthquakes that occurred before instrumental records, 'macroseismic' scales can estimate magnitude based on reports of felt intensity and damage.

The sheer variety of these scales reflects the complexity of earthquakes themselves and the ingenuity of seismologists in finding ways to measure them. Each scale offers a unique window into the Earth's restless forces, helping us to better understand, and ultimately prepare for, its powerful tremors.

Article

Seismic magnitude scales

Seismic magnitude scales are used to describe the overall strength or "size" of an earthquake. These are distinguished from seismic intensity scales that categorize the intensity or severity of ground shaking (quaking) caused by an earthquake at a given location. Magnitudes are usually determined from measurements of an earthquake's seismic waves as recorded on a seismogram. Magnitude scales vary based on what aspect of the seismic waves are measured and how they are measured. Different magnitude scales are necessary because of differences in earthquakes, the information available, and the purposes for which the magnitudes are used.

Earthquake magnitude and ground-shaking intensity

Seismic magnitude scales

Isoseismal map for the 1968 Illinois earthquake. The irregular distribution of shaking arises from variations of geology and ground conditions.

The Earth's crust is stressed by tectonic forces. When this stress becomes great enough to rupture the crust, or to overcome the friction that prevents one block of crust from slipping past another, energy is released, some of it in the form of various kinds of seismic waves that cause ground-shaking, or quaking.

Magnitude is an estimate of the relative "size" or strength of an earthquake, and thus its potential for causing ground-shaking. It is "approximately related to the released seismic energy".

Intensity refers to the strength or force of shaking at a given location, and can be related to the peak ground velocity. With an isoseismal map of the observed intensities (see illustration) an earthquake's magnitude can be estimated from both the maximum intensity observed (usually but not always near the epicenter), and from the extent of the area where the earthquake was felt.

The intensity of local ground-shaking depends on several factors besides the magnitude of the earthquake, one of the most important being soil conditions. For instance, thick layers of soft soil (such as fill) can amplify seismic waves, often at a considerable distance from the source, while sedimentary basins will often resonate, increasing the duration of shaking. This is why, in the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, the Marina district of San Francisco was one of the most damaged areas, though it was nearly 100 km from the epicenter. Geological structures were also significant, such as where seismic waves passing under the south end of San Francisco Bay reflected off the base of the Earth's crust towards San Francisco and Oakland. A similar effect channeled seismic waves between the other major faults in the area.

Magnitude scales

Seismic magnitude scales

Typical seismogram. The compressive P waves (following the red lines) – essentially sound passing through rock – are the fastest seismic waves, and arrive first, typically in about 10 seconds for an earthquake around 50 km away. The sideways-shaking S waves (following the green lines) arrive some seconds later, traveling a little over half the speed of the P waves; the delay is a direct indication of the distance to the quake. S waves may take an hour to reach a point 1000 km away. Both of these are body-waves, that pass directly through the earth's crust. Following the S waves are various kinds of surface-waves – Love waves and Rayleigh waves – that travel only at the earth's surface. Surface waves are smaller for deep earthquakes, which have less interaction with the surface. For shallow earthquakes – less than roughly 60 km deep – the surface waves are stronger, and may last several minutes; these carry most of the energy of the quake, and cause the most severe damage.

An earthquake radiates energy in the form of different kinds of seismic waves, whose characteristics reflect the nature of both the rupture and the earth's crust the waves travel through. Determination of an earthquake's magnitude generally involves identifying specific kinds of these waves on a seismogram, and then measuring one or more characteristics of a wave, such as its timing, orientation, amplitude, frequency, or duration. Additional adjustments are made for distance, kind of crust, and the characteristics of the seismograph that recorded the seismogram.

The various magnitude scales represent different ways of deriving magnitude from such information as is available. All magnitude scales retain the logarithmic scale as devised by Charles Richter, and are adjusted so the mid-range approximately correlates with the original "Richter" scale.

Most magnitude scales are based on measurements of only part of an earthquake's seismic wave-train, and therefore are incomplete. This results in systematic underestimation of magnitude in certain cases, a condition called saturation.

Since 2005 the International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior (IASPEI) has standardized the measurement procedures and equations for the principal magnitude scales, ML , Ms , mb , mB and mbLg .

"Richter" magnitude scale

The first scale for measuring earthquake magnitudes, developed in 1935 by Charles F. Richter and popularly known as the "Richter" scale, is actually the local magnitude scale, label ML or ML. Richter established two features common to all magnitude scales.

• First, the scale is logarithmic, so that each unit represents a ten-fold increase in the amplitude of the seismic waves. As the energy of a wave is proportional to A1.5, where A denotes the amplitude, each unit of magnitude represents a 101.5 ≈ 32-fold increase in the seismic energy (strength) of an earthquake. • Second, Richter arbitrarily defined the zero point of the scale to be where an earthquake at a distance of 100 km makes a maximum horizontal displacement of 0.001 mm (1 μm, or 0.00004 in.) on a seismogram recorded with a Wood-Anderson torsion seismograph. Subsequent magnitude scales are calibrated to be approximately in accord with the original "Richter" (local) scale around magnitude 6.

All "Local" (ML) magnitudes are based on the maximum amplitude of the ground shaking, without distinguishing the different seismic waves. They underestimate the strength:

• of distant earthquakes (over ~600 km) because of attenuation of the S waves, • of deep earthquakes because the surface waves are smaller, and • of strong earthquakes (over M ~7) because they do not take into account the duration of shaking.

The original "Richter" scale, developed in the geological context of Southern California and Nevada, was later found to be inaccurate for earthquakes in the central and eastern parts of the North American continent (everywhere east of the Rocky Mountains) because of differences in the continental crust. All these problems prompted the development of other scales.

Most seismological authorities, such as the United States Geological Survey, report earthquake magnitudes above 4.0 as moment magnitude Mw , which the press describes as "Richter magnitude".

Other "local" magnitude scales

Richter's original "local" scale has been adapted for other localities. These may be labelled "ML", or with a lowercase "l", either Ml, or Ml. (Not to be confused with the Russian surface-wave MLH scale.) Whether the values are comparable depends on whether the local conditions have been adequately determined and the formula suitably adjusted.

Japan Meteorological Agency magnitude scale

In Japan, for shallow (depth < 60 km) earthquakes within 600 km, the Japanese Meteorological Agency calculates a magnitude labeled MJMA, MJMA, or MJ. (These should not be confused with moment magnitudes JMA calculates, which are labeled Mw(JMA) or M(JMA), nor with the Shindo intensity scale.) JMA magnitudes are based (as typical with local scales) on the maximum amplitude of the ground motion; they agree "rather well" with the seismic moment magnitude Mw in the range of 4.5 to 7.5, but underestimate larger magnitudes.

Body-wave magnitude scales

Body-waves consist of P waves that are the first to arrive (see seismogram), or S waves, or reflections of either. Body-waves travel through rock directly.

mB scale

The original "body-wave magnitude" – mB or mB (uppercase "B") – was developed by Gutenberg 1945c and Gutenberg & Richter 1956 to overcome the distance and magnitude limitations of the ML scale inherent in the use of surface waves. mB is based on the P and S waves, measured over a longer period, and does not saturate until around M 8. However, it is not sensitive to events smaller than about M 5.5. Use of mB as originally defined has been largely abandoned, replaced by the standardized mBBB  scale.

mb scale

The mb or mb scale (lowercase "m" and "b") is similar to mB , but uses only P waves measured in the first few seconds on a specific model of short-period seismograph. It was introduced in the 1960s with the establishment of the World-Wide Standardized Seismograph Network (WWSSN); the short period improves detection of smaller events, and better discriminates between tectonic earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions.

Measurement of mb has changed several times. As originally defined by Gutenberg (1945c) mb was based on the maximum amplitude of waves in the first 10 seconds or more. However, the length of the period influences the magnitude obtained. Early USGS/NEIC practice was to measure mb on the first second (just the first few P waves), but since 1978 they measure the first twenty seconds. The modern practice is to measure short-period mb scale at less than three seconds, while the broadband mBBB  scale is measured at periods of up to 30 seconds.

mbLg scale

Differences in the crust underlying North America east of the Rocky Mountains makes that area more sensitive to earthquakes. Shown here: the 1895 New Madrid earthquake, M ~6, was felt through most of the central U.S., while the 1994 Northridge quake, though almost ten times stronger at M 6.7, was felt only in southern California. From USGS Fact Sheet 017–03.

The regional mbLg scale – also denoted mbLg, mbLg, MLg (USGS), Mn, and mN – was developed by Nuttli (1973) for a problem the original ML scale could not handle: all of North America east of the Rocky Mountains. The ML scale was developed in southern California, which lies on blocks of oceanic crust, typically basalt or sedimentary rock, which have been accreted to the continent. East of the Rockies the continent is a craton, a thick and largely stable mass of continental crust that is largely granite, a harder rock with different seismic characteristics. In this area the ML scale gives anomalous results for earthquakes that by other measures seemed equivalent to quakes in California.

Nuttli resolved this by measuring the amplitude of short-period (~ 1 second) Lg waves, a complex form of the Love wave that, although a surface wave, he found provided a result more closely related to the mb scale than the Ms scale. Lg waves attenuate quickly along any oceanic path, but propagate well through the granitic continental crust, and MbLg is often used in areas of stable continental crust; it is especially useful for detecting underground nuclear explosions.

Surface-wave magnitude scales

Surface waves propagate along the Earth's surface, and are principally either Rayleigh waves or Love waves. For shallow earthquakes the surface waves carry most of the energy of the earthquake, and are the most destructive. Deeper earthquakes, having less interaction with the surface, produce weaker surface waves.

The surface-wave magnitude scale, variously denoted as Ms, MS, and Ms, is based on a procedure developed by Beno Gutenberg in 1942 for measuring shallow earthquakes stronger or more distant than Richter's original scale could handle. Notably, it measured the amplitude of surface waves (which generally produce the largest amplitudes) for a period of "about 20 seconds". The Ms scale approximately agrees with ML at ~6, then diverges by as much as half a magnitude. A revision by Nuttli (1983), sometimes labeled MSn, measures only waves of the first second.

A modification – the "Moscow-Prague formula" – was proposed in 1962, and recommended by the IASPEI in 1967; this is the basis of the standardized Ms20 scale (Ms20, Ms(20)). A "broad-band" variant (MsBB, Ms(BB)) measures the largest velocity amplitude in the Rayleigh-wave train for periods up to 60 seconds. The MS7 scale used in China is a variant of Ms calibrated for use with the Chinese-made "type 763" long-period seismograph.

The MLH scale used in some parts of Russia is actually a surface-wave magnitude.

Moment magnitude and energy magnitude scales

Other magnitude scales are based on aspects of seismic waves that only indirectly and incompletely reflect the force of an earthquake, involve other factors, and are generally limited in some respect of magnitude, focal depth, or distance. The moment magnitude scale – Mw or Mw – developed by seismologists Thomas C. Hanks and Hiroo Kanamori, is based on an earthquake's seismic moment, M0, a measure of how much work an earthquake does in sliding one patch of rock past another patch of rock. Seismic moment is measured in newton-meters (N m or N⋅m) in the SI, or dyne-centimeters (dyn⋅cm; 1 dyn⋅cm = 10−7 N⋅m) in the older CGS system. In the simplest case the moment can be calculated knowing only the amount of slip, the area of the surface ruptured or slipped, and a factor for the resistance or friction encountered. These factors can be estimated for an existing fault to determine the magnitude of past earthquakes, or what might be anticipated for the future.

An earthquake's seismic moment can be estimated in various ways, which are the bases of the Mwb, Mwr, Mwc, Mww, Mwp, Mi, and Mwpd scales, all subtypes of the generic Mw scale. See Moment magnitude scale § Subtypes for details.

Seismic moment is considered the most objective measure of an earthquake's "size" in regard of total energy. However, it is based on a simple model of rupture, and on certain simplifying assumptions; it does not account for the fact that the proportion of energy radiated as seismic waves varies among earthquakes.

Much of an earthquake's total energy as measured by Mw is dissipated as friction (resulting in heating of the crust). An earthquake's potential to cause strong ground shaking depends on the comparatively small fraction of energy radiated as seismic waves, and is better measured on the energy magnitude scale, Me. The proportion of total energy radiated as seismic waves varies greatly depending on focal mechanism and tectonic environment; Me and Mw for very similar earthquakes can differ by as much as 1.4 units.

Despite the usefulness of the Me scale, it is not generally used due to difficulties in estimating the radiated seismic energy.

Energy class (K-class) scale

K (from the Russian word класс, 'class', in the sense of a category) is a measure of earthquake magnitude in the energy class or K-class system, developed in 1955 by Soviet seismologists in the remote Garm (Tajikistan) region of Central Asia; in revised form it is still used for local and regional quakes in many states formerly aligned with the Soviet Union (including Cuba). Based on seismic energy (K = log ES, in Joules), difficulty in implementing it using the technology of the time led to revisions in 1958 and 1960. Adaptation to local conditions has led to various regional K scales, such as KF and KS.

K values are logarithmic, similar to Richter-style magnitudes, but have a different scaling and zero point. K values in the range of 12 to 15 correspond approximately to M 4.5 to 6. M(K), M(K), or possibly MK indicates a magnitude M calculated from an energy class K.

Tsunami magnitude scales

Earthquakes that generate tsunamis generally rupture relatively slowly, delivering more energy at longer periods (lower frequencies) than generally used for measuring magnitudes. Any skew in the spectral distribution can result in larger, or smaller, tsunamis than expected for a nominal magnitude. The tsunami magnitude scale, Mt, is based on a correlation by Katsuyuki Abe of earthquake seismic moment (M0 ) with the amplitude of tsunami waves as measured by tidal gauges. Originally intended for estimating the magnitude of historic earthquakes where seismic data is lacking but tidal data exist, the correlation can be reversed to predict tidal height from earthquake magnitude. (Not to be confused with the height of a tidal wave, or run-up, which is an intensity effect controlled by local topography.) Under low-noise conditions, tsunami waves as little as 5 cm can be predicted, corresponding to an earthquake of M ~6.5.

Another scale of particular importance for tsunami warnings is the mantle magnitude scale, Mm. This is based on Rayleigh waves that penetrate into the Earth's mantle, and can be determined quickly, and without complete knowledge of other parameters such as the earthquake's depth.

Duration and coda magnitude scales

Md designates various scales that estimate magnitude from the duration or length of some part of the seismic wave-train. This is especially useful for measuring local or regional earthquakes, both powerful earthquakes that might drive the seismometer off-scale (a problem with the analog instruments formerly used) and preventing measurement of the maximum wave amplitude, and weak earthquakes, whose maximum amplitude is not accurately measured. Even for distant earthquakes, measuring the duration of the shaking (as well as the amplitude) provides a better measure of the earthquake's total energy. Measurement of duration is incorporated in some modern scales, such as Mwpd  and mBc .

Mc scales usually measure the duration or amplitude of a part of the seismic wave, the coda. For short distances (less than ~100 km) these can provide a quick estimate of magnitude before the quake's exact location is known.

Macroseismic magnitude scales

Magnitude scales generally are based on instrumental measurement of some aspect of the seismic wave as recorded on a seismogram. Where such records do not exist, magnitudes can be estimated from reports of the macroseismic events such as described by intensity scales.

One approach for doing this (developed by Beno Gutenberg and Charles Richter in 1942) relates the maximum intensity observed (presumably this is over the epicenter), denoted I0 (capital I with a subscripted zero), to the magnitude. It has been recommended that magnitudes calculated on this basis be labeled Mw(I0), but are sometimes labeled with a more generic Mms.

Another approach is to make an isoseismal map showing the area over which a given level of intensity was felt. The size of the "felt area" can also be related to the magnitude (based on the work of Frankel 1994 and Johnston 1996). While the recommended label for magnitudes derived in this way is M0(An), the more commonly seen label is Mfa. A variant, MLa, adapted to California and Hawaii, derives the local magnitude (ML) from the size of the area affected by a given intensity. MI (upper-case letter "I", distinguished from the lower-case letter in Mi) has been used for moment magnitudes estimated from isoseismal intensities calculated per Johnston 1996.

Peak ground velocity (PGV) and peak ground acceleration (PGA) are measures of the force that causes destructive ground shaking. In Japan, a network of strong-motion accelerometers provides PGA data that permits site-specific correlation with different magnitude earthquakes. This correlation can be inverted to estimate the ground shaking at that site due to an earthquake of a given magnitude at a given distance. From this a map showing areas of likely damage can be prepared within minutes of an actual earthquake.

Other magnitude scales

Many earthquake magnitude scales have been developed or proposed, with some never gaining broad acceptance and remaining only as obscure references in historical catalogs of earthquakes. Other scales have been used without a definite name, often referred to as "the method of Smith (1965)" (or similar language), with the authors often revising their method. On top of this, seismological networks vary on how they measure seismograms. Where the details of how a magnitude has been determined are unknown, catalogs will specify the scale as "unknown" (variously Unk, Ukn, or UK). In such cases, the magnitude is considered generic and approximate.

An Mh ("magnitude determined by hand") label has been used where the magnitude is too small or the data too poor (typically from analog equipment) to determine a Local magnitude, or multiple shocks or cultural noise complicates the records. The Southern California Seismic Network uses this "magnitude" where the data fail the quality criteria.

A special case is the Seismicity of the Earth catalog of Gutenberg & Richter (1954). Hailed as a milestone as a comprehensive global catalog of earthquakes with uniformly calculated magnitudes, they never published the full details of how they determined those magnitudes. Consequently, while some catalogs identify these magnitudes as MGR, others use UK (meaning "computational method unknown"). Subsequent study found many of the Ms values to be "considerably overestimated". Further study has found that most of the MGR magnitudes "are basically Ms for large shocks shallower than 40 km, but are basically mB for large shocks at depths of 40–60 km". Gutenberg and Richter also used an italic, non-bold M without subscript – also used as a generic magnitude, and not to be confused with the bold, non-italic M used for moment magnitude – and a "unified magnitude" m (bolding added). While these terms (with various adjustments) were used in scientific articles into the 1970s, they have become of only historical interest. An ordinary (non-italic, non-bold) capital "M" without subscript is often used to refer to magnitude generically, where an exact value or the specific scale used is not important.